Corporate Europe Observatory

Exposing the power of corporate lobbying in the EU

  • Dansk
  • NL
  • EN
  • FI
  • FR
  • DE
  • EL
  • IT
  • NO
  • PL
  • PT
  • RO
  • SL
  • ES
  • SV

Commission sued over privileged access

Brussels, 15 February 2011 - Lobby watchdog Corporate Europe Observatory is suing the European Commission in the EU’s General Court for withholding documents related to the EU’s free trade talks with India. The Commission is accused of discriminating in favour of corporate lobby groups and of violating the EU's transparency rules [1].

The case concerns 17 documents, including meeting reports, emails and a letter, which the Commission sent to industry lobby groups including BusinessEurope but refused to release in full to Corporate Europe Observatory. The Commission claims that the censored information is sensitive as it concerns the EU’s priorities and strategies in the ongoing trade negotiations with India. The Commission argues that disclosing this information would undermine the EU’s international relations.

Corporate Europe Observatory trade campaigner Pia Eberhardt said:

“If the Commission has already shared information with the business world at large, the same information cannot suddenly become confidential when a public interest group asks for it. This is a case of manifest discrimination and violates the EU’s access to information rules.”

Among the censored documents is a letter to BusinessEurope from former EU Trade Commissioner Peter Mandelson in March 2008, from which comments on the EU and Indian negotiating positions have been deleted [2]. In a handwritten note at the bottom, Mandelson had expressly invited BusinessEurope to discuss the letter with the Confederation of Indian Industries (CII). As both BusinessEurope and the CII have thousands of members, the letter was effectively put on general release the moment it was sent out.

The lawsuit is a last resort for Corporate Europe Observatory after the Commission repeatedly refused to release the information about ongoing trade negotiations, following access to document requests.

Pia Eberhardt added:

“The Commission must end its flawed practice of granting big business privileged access to EU trade policy-making, at the expense of wider public interest. Such discrimination leads to a trade policy which caters for big business needs, but which has devastating effects for people’s rights and the environment.”

In December, more than 200 civil society organisations from the EU and India called for an immediate halt to the EU-India free trade talks, which they fear will fuel poverty, inequality and environmental destruction [3]. Negotiations are set to conclude by mid-2011.

Corporate Europe Observatory’s application will now be reviewed by the General Court and sent to the European Commission. The Commission has two months and ten days to reply, but can seek an extension. Once the written procedure is declared closed, the General Court will set a date for an oral hearing in Luxembourg.

Pia Eberhardt, pia[at]


[1] In the General Court of the European Union. Application for Annulment of Stichting Corporate Europe Observatory against the European Commission, 15 February 2011. A background article on the case can be downloaded below and at:

[2] The partially released letter from Peter Mandelson to BusinessEurope’s Director General, Philippe de Buck, dated 18 March 2008, can be downloaded below.

[3] Last chance to prevent onslaught on people's rights and livelihoods! Indian and European civil society groups call for an immediate halt to the India-EU trade negotiations, 8 December 2010,

Related issues: 

LEt’s kick Big Oil and Gas out of EU and UN climate policy. sign the petition now!

The EU-Canada trade deal CETA continues to draw heavy criticism. Behind the PR attempts to sell it as a progressive agreement - including a recent declaration hammered out by Brussels and Ottawa - CETA remains what it always has been: an attack on democracy, workers, and the environment.
There are many potential winners of the awards for the worst lobbyist on TTIP, probably the most corporate dominated trade negotiations in history.
Business lobby groups are pushing hard for investor-state dispute settlement in TTIP and similar trade deals. If successful, this would expand the ability of corporations to sue governments in response to policies that allegedly limit their profits. Especially laws to protect human health and the environment would be on the line.
CETA is a sweeping trade deal restricting public policy options in areas as diverse as intellectual property rights, government procurement, food safety, financial regulation, the temporary movement of workers, domestic regulation and public services, to name just a few of the topics explored in this analysis.
As world leaders prepare for COP22 in Marrakesh, Morocco, this November, the oil and gas industry retains a firm grip on the UN climate talks and climate policy in general. It’s time to break free and reclaim power over climate policy.
The EU-Canada trade deal CETA continues to draw heavy criticism. Behind the PR attempts to sell it as a progressive agreement - including a recent declaration hammered out by Brussels and Ottawa - CETA remains what it always has been: an attack on democracy, workers, and the environment.
Corporations like Monsanto have limitless resources to buy political power through lobbying. This short guide, published at the occasion of the International Monsanto Tribunal in The Hague, exposes some of Monsanto’s key lobbying strategies and tools, illustrated with examples from different parts of the world.
How the agribusiness lobby has weakened the new EU air quality directive with serious consequences for health. An article written by Vincent Harmsen en Berna van Vilsteren and translated by Iris Maher.
-- placeholder --

The corporate lobby tour