Greenpeace Stop gas, End war

Ukraine crisis

The terrible events unfolding in Ukraine as a result of Putin’s invasion mean suffering and misery for millions. The ramifications will not just be felt in Ukraine and Russia, but across Europe and the globe for years to come. Already corporate lobbyists have used the war to roll back very urgent steps to implement the the EU Farm to Fork Strategy, while also promoting new fossil fuel projects in Europe and around the world. Below Corporate Europe Observatory brings you its latest analysis on lobbying and the Ukraine crisis, from energy and agriculture policy, to tracking the corporate opportunists and their lobby demands, and Putin's support for the far-right across Europe. We also revisit our previous work to show the context of the crisis and to draw lessons for the future.

Lobby firewalls for repressive regimes

Corporate Europe Observatory campaigner Vicky Cann says:

“Lobbying for the Kremlin, for its rich cronies, and for Russian corporations like Gazprom has been big business in Brussels. Anyone doing this work must be immediately banned from lobbying Commissioners, officials, MEPs, assistants, and member state Permanent Representations. But this is not just an issue about the Putin regime. PR merchants and guns-for-hire lobbyists have long been employed by repressive regimes from around the world and have enjoyed easy lobby access and influence in Brussels. They and all corporations with close ties to these egregious governments must be banned from lobbying the EU. We also need to get tough on the revolving door and on political party funding linked to brutal governments, and urgently open up company and asset ownership data so we can track dirty money across the EU and globally.”

We make the following demands of EU and national decision-makers across Europe:

  • In line with the Fossil Free Politics approach, all fossil fuel interests, including those from repressive regimes, should have no access to EU decision-makers including EU Commissioners, officials, MEPs, assistants, and member state Permanent Representations, and they should avoid all conflicts of interests, preferential treatment, and partnerships with the fossil fuel industry. 
  • We are aware that there is no widely-accepted definition and list of “repressive regimes” with which to frame this demand and those that follow below, but it is imperative that in the rush to move away from Russian fossil fuels and other corporate interests, that we do not simply replace them with dirty energy and lobbying from other repressive regimes such as Saudi Arabia and others around the world.
  • There is a long and ignoble history of lobby intermediaries – lobby consultancies, PR companies, law firms, trade associations, think tanks and others – trying to influence EU and member state policy-makers, and public opinion, on behalf of repressive regimes or their close associates. This lobbying and disinformation activity by such intermediaries must now be immediately banned. This does not apply to strict diplomatic contacts. 
  • Additionally, companies and their subsidiaries, and other organisations which are closely associated with repressive governments should be banned from having lobby access to EU and member state policy-makers, and from applying for EU public procurement contracts.
  • Because this is not just a problem at the EU level, all member states should implement legally-binding lobby transparency registers which take similar steps to ban lobbying and disinformation campaigns on behalf of repressive regimes and their close associates.
  • Too many former politicians and officials have taken lucrative jobs with corporations or other organisations closely associated with repressive regimes. This revolving door must be blocked at the EU and member state level on the grounds of conflicts of interest and political integrity.
  • Sponsorship and funding of EU and national political parties, politicians or political events by repressive regimes, their corporations, and representatives must be banned. This includes funding politicians’ offices and overseas trips, as well as European Parliament intergroups and unofficial groupings.
  • More generally, tackling lobbying and influence of repressive regimes in the EU institutions should be part of the remit of the new independent ethics body.
  • Transparency alone cannot tackle repressive regimes nor the corporate capture of decision making, but it can make a major difference to public understanding of the nature of these governments, expose links, and chase down dirty money. Publicly accessible company and beneficial ownership registers are long overdue and must be implemented immediately across Europe. If implemented internationally too, such a register could ensure that the sanctions regime is properly targeted at wealthy oligarchs and not ordinary citizens.  

On 4 July 2022, Corporate Europe Observatory campaigner Vicky Cann said:

“It took six rounds of sanctions on Russia for the EU to turn its attention to lobbying, and the problem is still not fixed. The EU’s piecemeal approach is not working - lobbyists will always find a way to dodge weak rules and mine loopholes. We need an urgent EU ban on all forms of lobbying by repressive regimes and their corporate allies, and to firmly shut the door on fossil fuel lobbyists. Both the Ukraine crisis and the climate emergency deserve this urgent action.”

For more information check out the following links:

CEO report (2015): Spin doctors to the autocrats

Twitter thread: 30 March 2022

NGO letter supporting beneficial registers: 9 March 2022

Twitter thread: 4 July 2022

Quote 4.7.22

Tackling the energy and climate crises

Corporate Europe Observatory climate campaigner Pascoe Sabido says:

“Europe’s dependence on Russian gas is not an accident but a consequence of how the fossil fuel industry has captured EU decision-making. Back in 2014 the EU chose to invest billions in new gas pipelines and LNG terminals rather than investing in sustainable renewables and energy efficiency. And this capture continues today in the continent’s response to the Ukraine war: the EU wants to replace Russian gas with imports from other repressive regimes like Azerbaijan or Egypt, or destructive fracked gas from the US. That’s not a real solution, and nor is providing support for industry favourites like hydrogen and biomethane. Rather than spending billions on arms and militarisation, the EU should invest in real renewable energy solutions and a mass energy efficiency programme to insulate homes, create jobs and tackle energy poverty and the growing cost-of-living crisis.”

For more information check out the following links:

Op ed: Why Europe can't break free from the gas lobby. 13 April 2022

Podcast: Hooked on gas: EU and the Ukraine war. 13 April 2022

Twitter thread 1: 25 March 2022  

Twitter thread 2: 25 March 2022

CEO report (2017): The great gas lock-in

Big oil

Making agriculture less dependent on fossil fuels

Corporate Europe Observatory agriculture campaigner Nina Holland says:

"There has been an immense and well-resourced lobby campaign conducted against the EU's Farm to Fork Strategy by pesticide lobby groups and their allies. But now, and very cynically, the conflict in Ukraine is being instrumentalised by vested interests to ramp up the pressure to get crucial environmental and health commitments off the table. Big farm lobby groups and the Conservatives are scaremongering decision-makers about food security. However, Putin's war in Ukraine shows precisely the urgency to make food production less dependent on fossil fuels, pesticides and fertilisers. Short-term measures to ensure food security should instead focus on abandoning subsidies for biofuels, and reducing livestock production and food waste. As the Commission has postponed the publication of the pesticides reduction proposal by a few months, we can expect the pesticide lobby to use this time for further derailing tactics." 

For more information check out the following links:

CEO report (16 March 2022): A loud lobby for a silent spring

Podcast (29 March 2022): Ukraine war, food crisis and a toxic lobby

Op ed: Exploiting the Ukraine crisis for Big Business. 27 July 2022


Cover of pesticide report, man spreading toxic fumes

Exposing Putin's denazification propaganda

Corporate Europe Observatory campaigner Margarida Silva says:

“Putin has tried to frame his invasion of Ukraine as "denazification" and as a fight against fascism. But this framing is a gross distortion of the truth. Putin and his political party have been some of the biggest supporters of the racist and xenophobic far-right across Europe. Le Pen and Rassemblement National in France are the ultimate success of the Kremlin strategy to seduce the far-right. But there is also Salvini and Lega in Italy, Orbán’s Fidesz in Hungary, and the FPÖ in Austria. These parties and leaders may now be scrambling to disassociate themselves from the Kremlin, but with national elections due in France, Hungary, and Austria this year, we hope voters recognise these political parties for what they really are.”

For more information check out the following links:

CEO report (2019): Europe’s two-faced authoritarian right

Twitter thread: 14 March 2022

Le Pen

This article continues after the banner

Support CEO so we can stay independent!