Corporate Europe Observatory

Exposing the power of corporate lobbying in the EU

  • Dansk
  • NL
  • EN
  • FI
  • FR
  • DE
  • EL
  • IT
  • NO
  • PL
  • PT
  • RO
  • SL
  • ES
  • SV

EFSA accused of legal bullying by campaign group

EFSA accused of legal bullying by campaign group

Brussels, 27 September – Campaigners today accused the European Food Safety Authority of using legal threats to try and intimidate its critics, after receiving a legal threat from the EU agency [1].

Research and campaign group Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) received a letter from EFSA’s Head of the Legal and Regulatory Affairs Unit following publication of an article highlighting hidden conflicts of interest among members of EFSA’s expert panel responsible for food additives.

The letter targeted a spoof logo used by CEO to illustrate the article on its website [2], which EFSA claimed was unauthorised as the name and logo were protected under the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property. CEO has responded to the letter [3], pointing out that the illustration does not use EFSA’s name – and that it is a parody of EFSA’s logo, clearly intended to ridicule EFSA’s apparent links to industry and covered by the right to freedom of speech and expression.

Olivier Hoedeman, research coordinator for Corporate Europe Observatory, said:

“EFSA seems intent on using intimidation, rather than providing answers to the questions we have raised about conflicts of interest among the agency’s experts. This kind of legal bullying is no way for an EU-body to deal with serious criticism. EFSA is supposed to represent the public interest, yet is behaving like a private company.”

A number of MEPs have raised questions about EFSA’s independence [4] following a series of critical reports by NGOs [5]. The European Court of Auditors is currently investigating EFSA and other EU agencies over alleged conflicts of interest.

CEO is calling the European Commission to introduce new rules for EFSA and other EU agencies regarding the recruitment of experts, based on including a strong and strictly enforced definition of conflicts of interest, and a requirement for experts’ declarations of interest to be independently audited.

ENDS

Contact:

Olivier Hoedeman, tel: +32 (0)2 893 0930 – mobile: +32 (0)474 486 545 – email: olivier@corporateeurope.org

Notes:

[1] http://www.corporateeurope.org/legal-letter-efsa#

[2] http://www.corporateeurope.org/publications/eu-food-additive-experts-fai...

[3] http://www.corporateeurope.org/response-efsa-re-use-logo

[4] See for example: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+WQ+E-20...

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+WQ+E-20...

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+WQ+E-20...

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+WQ+E...

[5] See for example:

http://www.foeeurope.org/GMOs/publications/EFSAreport.pdf

http://www.corporateeurope.org/agribusiness/news/2010/03/24/efsas-revolv...

http://www.corporateeurope.org/agribusiness/content/2010/11/big-food-sha...

http://www.testbiotech.de/sites/default/files/EFSA_Playing_Field_of_ILSI...

http://www.earthopensource.org/index.php/reports/10-europes-pesticide-an...

Corporate Europe Observatory is a research and campaign group working to expose and challenge the privileged access and influence enjoyed by corporations and their lobby groups in EU policy making.

Related issues: 
 

The corporate lobby tour

Heard by the European Parliament's Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, Bernhard Url, EFSA's director, said that the EU had "enough scientific capability around [...] without a chief scientific adviser".
An analysis of the revised independence policy of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). More reworded than revised, actually.
Will EFSA become more transparent, and to lobbyists or scientists? After its public consultation on its draft transparency policy, the Authority must now choose.
A presentation explaining the situation at the European Food Safety Authority and why conflicts of interest scandals keep accumulating there.
Four months before world governments meet in Paris to negotiate the deal they claim will “save the climate”, 1500 protestors took matters into their own hands by entering an opencast lignite mine owned by energy provider RWE in western Germany.
The stubborn and aggressive imposition of privatisation by Troika goes against the will of Greek citizens and represents a direct attack on democracy.
Publicly, business lobby groups are heavily pushing the idea that TTIP will benefit small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). But behind closed doors they admit the reality: that small companies will “face increased competition” and that “benefits remain hypothetical”.

Stop the Crop

Alternative Trade Mandate