Corporate Europe Observatory

Exposing the power of corporate lobbying in the EU

MEPs vested interests uncovered in EU's raw materials strategy

  • Dansk
  • Nederlands
  • English
  • Suomi
  • Français
  • Deutsch
  • Ελληνικά
  • Italiano
  • Bokmål
  • Polski
  • Portuguese
  • Română
  • Slovenščina
  • Español
  • Svenska

Brussels, 27 June 2011 – Europe's future strategy on access to raw materials – due to be voted on in the Parliament on Thursday 30 June – is being shaped by MEPs with vested interests in related industry sectors, a new report from Corporate Europe Observatory, published today, reveals [1].

Europe's resource grab highlights how key MEPs working on the EU raw materials initiative have pushed for big business to obtain unbridled access to exploit other countries' natural resources, while trying to block measures to protect the environment and workers' rights. A number of the MEPs have close links to related industry, including paid jobs and board positions.

Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) says the report reveals how vested interests are undermining the Parliament's ability to act in the public interest and is calling on the Buzek working group - which is currently developing a new code of conduct for MEPs – to act to tackle conflicts of interest, including through MEP-industry groups [2]. CEO says MEPs should be banned from holding additional paid jobs which create a conflict of interest. One in seven MEPs are thought to have a second job, often involving lobbying or influencing work [3]. The Buzek working group is expected to finalise the draft code of conduct this week.

CEO researcher and report author Pia Eberhardt said:

"Our research found that some MEPs are blatantly pushing their own vested interests and the interests of big business in promoting an EU resource grab around the world. They have argued that business must be able to access other countries’ natural resources, regardless of the rights of sovereign peoples, or measures to protect the environment and advance economic development."

The EU's raw materials initiative, published in February, has been discussed in six parliamentary committees and will be voted on in the lead committee on industry, energy and research (ITRE) on 30 June.

The report highlights how the Austrian MEP Paul Rübig, who has financial interests in companies which depend on access to raw materials and close links to lobby groups representing related industry sectors, is taking a key role on the issue, having set up an MEP working group on raw materials, which will work closely with a parallel industry group. Rübig, who is known to some as Brussels' Mr Raw Materials, has called for unhampered access to raw materials within Europe, including in protected areas, as well as the use of trade measures to secure access to resources overseas.

German MEP Elmar Brok, who led the raw materials work on the foreign affairs committee (AFET), urged the use of military means to secure access to raw materials. Brok is a senior figure in the Bertelsmann group, which owns companies with interests in the defence sector.

A number of Nordic MEPs, some with interests in the shipping industry, are also highlighted for pushing for access to natural resources in the Arctic.

Pia Eberhardt continued:

"The raw materials initiative as it stands represents a neo-colonial push to grab natural resources from around the world, risking military conflict through resource wars. EU member states are signatories to UN conventions which recognise the rights of people to determine how their natural resources should be used. The EU must also recognise those sovereign rights – and develop a strategy based on sustainable resource use, reduced demand and greater re-use and recycling of raw materials."

The need for a different approach has indeed been endorsed by some MEPs involved in the initiative, who have called for a strategy to help resource-rich countries diversify their economies and reduce dependency on raw materials to protect exhaustible natural resources. The Irish MEP Paul Murphy told CEO that the current proposals were solely in the interests of big business and as such were likely to have a damaging effect on people [4].

 

Contact

Pia Eberhardt, pia[at]corporateeurope.org

 

Notes

[1] Europe's resource grab - vested interests at work in the European Parliament, Corporate Europe Observatory, June 2011.

[2] The ad hoc working group led by Parliamentary President Jerzy Buzek was set up to develop a code of conduct for MEPs and improve transparency around relations between MEPs and lobbyists, after three MEPs were caught in a newspaper sting operation accepting well-paid second jobs in return for tabling amendments. The group is expected to finalise a draft code of conduct this week. Corporate Europe Observatory is calling on the group to include:

  • A ban on all second paid jobs for MEPs where lobbying is involved or which require them to represent others. Such paid jobs include lawyers, accountants, company board members and consultants.

  • The introduction of a detailed financial declaration by MEPs which requires them to list all outside earnings and other private interests.

  • Mandatory requirements that all cross-party groups register with the parliamentary authorities and declare their membership and income.

[3] Corporate Europe Observatory (2011): MEPs and second jobs - time to regulate.

[4] MEP: Raw Materials Initiative only in the interes of big business.

Related issues: 
 

Polluters in Peru blog

Civil society organisations denounce European Commission’s leaked proposal
On 17 April, Via Campesina, the D190-20 Alliance and Corporate Europe Observatory held a lobby tour around the Brussels European quarter, highlighting the corporate lobbies who are pushing an aggressive agenda around TTIP (the EU-US trade deal currently being negotiated). There was a particular emphasis on the impacts TTIP will have, if passed, for farmers' livelihoods, food standards, and for the way food is produced in the EU. The next negotiation round will take place on 20 April, this time in New York.
In response to the criticism of the controversial investor rights in TTIP, a number of law firms recently founded a think tank designed to protect the current investment arbitration system: The European Federation for Investment Law and Arbitration (EFILA).
Regulatory cooperation could become the graveyard of public interest lawmaking.
The way in which the Commission has appointed the head of its “in-house think-tank” has demonstrated its woefully inadequate conflict of interest assessment for new appointments, says Corporate Europe Observatory. The conflict of interest assessment applied to the former chief of the Lisbon Council, Ann Mettler as head of the new European Political Strategy Center (EPSC) does not appear to have explored her close cooperation with some of the biggest corporate players in the digital and technology market. In CEO's view, this casts serious doubts on the independence of the advice that is to be given to President Juncker and his college of commissioners.
Civil society organisations denounce European Commission’s leaked proposal
On 17 April, Via Campesina, the D190-20 Alliance and Corporate Europe Observatory held a lobby tour around the Brussels European quarter, highlighting the corporate lobbies who are pushing an aggressive agenda around TTIP (the EU-US trade deal currently being negotiated). There was a particular emphasis on the impacts TTIP will have, if passed, for farmers' livelihoods, food standards, and for the way food is produced in the EU. The next negotiation round will take place on 20 April, this time in New York.
New report by CEO and Friends of the Earth Europe on the European Commission's new advisory network on fracking, which is opening the back door to shale gas expansion across Europe, despite massive public opposition.

Alternative Trade Mandate

Corporate Europe Forum