Corporate Europe Observatory

Exposing the power of corporate lobbying in the EU

How can we trust EFSA?

  • Dansk
  • Nederlands
  • English
  • Français
  • Deutsch
  • Ελληνικά
  • Italiano
  • Portuguese
  • Español
Printer-friendly versionSend by emailPDF version
http://www.spectrezine.org/how-can-we-trust-eu-food-safety-authority-rev... How can we trust the EU Food Safety Authority? 'Revolving door' adviser damages EFSA's image Spectrezine, February 17, 2010 16:13 | Kartika Liotard Exchange of knowledge and a change of job is fine. But how do we deal with a former EU official who suddenly becomes a lobbyist for a seed improvement company or a biotechnology concern? I am the contact person for the European Parliament with the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). In this role I last week asked the EFSA management for an explanation as to how it could be that the former head of its gentech department is now lobbying in Brussels for biotech giant Syngenta? I'm waiting for the answer. A transfer of this kind, known in Brusselsspeak as a 'revolving door', is bad for EFSA's reputation as the authority for food safety. Such transfers make the public at large rightly suspicious when it comes to approval of the introduction of a transgenetic foodstuff. In professional football such instant transfers are normal, but in relation to scientists with strategic knowledge of government policy and food safety, simply the appearance of a conflict of interests is fatal. For that reason, it should not be possible to put your knowledge and network of contacts at the disposal of a commercial interest. Syngenta should have to combat competitors with honest arguments, not with foreknowledge. If Monsanto can no longer be relied upon to share its strategic knowledge with public authorities or with other scientists, because the chance exists that they will take it to Syngenta, in the end this would damage the interests of the consumer and undermine food safety. Europhiles regularly celebrate the principle of 'fair and undistorted competition'. That sounds fine, but the Syngenta affair was not raised by lobbyists or by EU institutions. That happened only when social activist organisations such as Corporate Europe Observatory made Syngenta's practices known. Should, then, the EU offer even higher salaries to its officials? Of course not. If you want to be a public employee, then you must serve the public interest. You have a duty to keep secrets and a duty, also, to make things known. Selling your knowledge to a single party is not what you should be doing! That is why openness, and a cooling-off period for 'revolving door' advisers, would be extremely prudent. Kartika Liotard is a Member of the European Parliament for the Socialist Party of the Netherlands. This article was first published in the Dutch daily farm sector newspaper the Agrarisch Dagblad on 3rd February 2010.

Similar entries

European Food Safety Authority admits failure on revolving doors

For the first time, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has admitted that it did not take the necessary action to stop revolving doors. EFSA has stated that “regrettably” the authority did not follow up the relevant information. Further, the authority acknowledges that it has strengthened internal rules in response. 

An open letter from CEO to the European Food Safety Authority

With this open letter Corporate Europe Observatory reacts to a letter that EFSA executive director Catherine Geslain-Lanéelle wrote to CEO in reaction to our investigative report, “Exposed: conflicts of interest among EFSA’s experts on food additives”.

Revolving doors - EFSA and Syngenta

Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) has sent a joint open letter to the European Commission to highlight concerns about "revolving doors" after the former head of the European Food Standards Agency GMO panel became a lobbyist for Syngenta. The European Food Standards Agency failed to intervene to impose a "cooling off" period before the move - which creates a clear conflict of interest.

European Ombudsman demands EFSA admits failure over revolving door

Munich/ Brussels, 8 December 2011: The European Ombudsman has ruled in favour of a complaint filed by Testbiotech against the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) regarding its approach to the 'revolving door'. The case concerns a former senior staff member at EFSA, Dr Suzy Renckens, who was head of the unit responsible for the risk assessment of genetically engineered plants for five years until 2008. Dr Renckens, a Belgian national, then moved to a job at Syngenta, a company that produces and markets these plants.

Food safety panel members "update" declarations of interest – admitting industry ties

Brussels, 4 July 2011 – Four members of a key European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) scientific panel have "updated" their declarations of interests following a Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) report revealing undeclared conflicts of interest. CEO is calling for stricter rules on conflicts of interest at EFSA that outlaw consultancy and advisory work on a paid or unpaid basis for food companies, food industry associations, and think tanks funded by the food industry.

Pages

No. Ireland, Vote for us on 31st of May

Corporate Europe Observatory

Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) is a research and campaign group working to expose and challenge the privileged access and influence enjoyed by corporations and their lobby groups in EU policy making.

Read more