Corporate Europe Observatory

Exposing the power of corporate lobbying in the EU

Action at WWF against 'responsible soy'

  • Dansk
  • Nederlands
  • English
  • Français
  • Deutsch
  • Ελληνικά
  • Italiano
  • Portuguese
  • Español
Printer-friendly versionSend by emailPDF version
Action at WWF in the Netherlands: GM toxic soy is not responsible!On May 19 2009, WWF-Netherlands head office received an extraordinary visit. A group of activists, including a weeping Panda, demanded that WWF withdraws from the Round Table on Responsible Soy (RTRS). However, WWF director stated that his organisation will continue to take part in this proces, that will certify GM RoundupReady soy as 'responsible'. On May 19 2009, WWF-Netherlands head office received an extraordinary visit. A group of activists, including a weeping Panda, demanded that WWF withdraws from the Round Table on Responsible Soy (RTRS).

Action against WWF support for Monsanto GM toxic soy at headoffice WWF-Netherlands

 

Today, the head office of WWF-Netherlands received some extraordinary visitors, including a weeping panda, a Monsanto circus director, and various people in white overalls spraying "Roundup".

The action is a protest on the occasion of the upcoming vote of the Round Table on Responsibe Soy (RTRS), on 28 May in Campinas (Brazil). This forum will allow GM RoundupReady soy to be certified as 'responsible', while in reality, this soy is responsible for massive use of pesticides as well as deforestation and driving small farmers from their lands.

During the action, the Monsanto circus director tried to convince the Panda to sign the RTRS Declaration that ends with the words "Hereby I declare GM RoundupReady soy RESPONSIBLE". The Panda, however, did clearly not agree, and refused to sign. Meanwhile, pesticide sprayers went around the building to spray the plants with a healthy dosis of 'Roundup'. Drummers and people spreading flyers made sure all employees were informed of the reason of the action.

The visitors publicly discussed the issue with Director of WWF-Netherlands, Johan van de Gronden. He maintained that WWF could exert more influence inside the RTRS than if it were to abandon the proces. In response, the activists said that WWF is in a very isolated position, as there is hardly any support from civil society in producer countries for the RTRS. Mr Van de Gronden did not want to explain how WWF would defend its choice to support a label for RoundupReady soy to the public and WWF supporters. He said that should be left up to them. Neither did he want to respond to the question what would be an acceptable outcome for WWF of the Campinas conference.

WWF and Solidaridad, a Dutch development and fair trade organisation, are the main drivers of the RTRS process from the NGO side. Industry participants however dominate the forum. No small farmer movements or indigenous peoples' organisations take part. Every RTRS conference so far has sparked protest and counter-declarations. FUNDAPAZ, an Argentinean NGO, has announced to leave the RTRS after the conference in Campinas.

The criteria have been widely criticised:
-       They don't stop deforestation, but rather legitimise soy expansion
-       GM RoundupReady soy will be given a 'green' label
-       Social and environmental criteria are often vague and very weak

Yet, despite this WWF keeps supporting the RTRS. Even though officially opposed to GMOs, the organisation is about to introduce a 'responsible' label for herbicide-resistant soy. 

 

You can still sign the petition on www.toxicsoy.org

Resources: 
 

Similar entries

Sign petition, halt GM 'responsible' soy

GM Toxic soy is not 'responsible'! Can genetically engineered soy - grown with large amounts of agri-chemicals - ever be called 'responsible'? You probably consider this to be impossible. The damage that Monsanto's Roundup Ready soy has done in countries such as Argentina and Paraguay is enormous. Despite that, by the end of May this very same soy will be labelled 'responsible' by the Round Table on Responsible Soy.

Ahold: RTRS certified soy means no improvement in soy production.

At the doorstep of Ahold’s sustainability office in Amsterdam, speakers from various organisations like FIAN (Netherlands) and Wervel (Belgium) highlighted the major flaws of the certification approach. In an indoors conversation beforehand, Byrnes had to admit that the only ‘advantage’ of participating in the Roundtable is ‘to be talking’ with the soy producers. But the criteria, which took 6 years to negotiate and millions of development aid, do not mean any step forward in terms of reducing the environmental and social impacts of soy monocultures.

Petition challenges 'green' soy label

Tell supermarkets not to mislead their consumers by committing "label fraud" - sign the petition here and help discredit the new label for ‘responsible’ soy, due to be launched by the Round Table on Responsible Soy this spring. There are separate actions for Germany, the UK, the Netherlands, Belgium, France and Spain.

The petition can be found on:

English: http://www.toxicsoy.org/toxicsoy/Action/action.html 

Opposition Round Table Responsible Soy

We invite all organisations to sign the Open Letter below, opposing the 'responsible' label for monoculture soy (including GM soy), developed by the industry's Round Table on Responsible Soy (RTRS). Please find the text of the letter below and attached. The RTRS is holding its 5th conference 9-10 June 2010 in Sao Paolo, Brazil. It is expected that the label will be launched in Europe some time after the conference. This is the time to once more voice strong opposition to this greenwashing of industrial soy!

Setbacks for Round Table Responsible Soy

The Round Table on Responsible Soy (RTRS), a much criticised initiative for the certification of soy as ‘responsible’, has stepped up its lobbying to be included under the EU's Renewable Energy Directive to certify ‘sustainable agrofuels’. This would give RTRS-approved soy, much of which would be produced in unsustainable and damaging monoculture farming, the EU's seal of approval in the context of the EU 10% agrofuels target.

Pages

Corporate Europe Observatory

Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) is a research and campaign group working to expose and challenge the privileged access and influence enjoyed by corporations and their lobby groups in EU policy making.

Read more